What the evidence currently shows.
We report verified progress, distinguish outputs from outcomes and make clear where evidence is still developing.
Impact is not a collection of large numbers.
For sTF5 Care, it is a disciplined question: what was delivered, what changed, what can be substantiated, and what still needs to be learned? Our monitoring and evaluation systems are being strengthened across the portfolio so that future decisions can rely on clearer outcome evidence, not activity alone.
reported rehabilitation sessions
people supported through Nemat Al-Tawfiq since 2017
reported funding for PT/OT services
reported high satisfaction with rehabilitation services
active patients reporting high-quality OT/PT services
scientific publications associated with supported MS research
The strongest current evidence is concentrated in access to and quality of healthcare services. The longer-term programme framework also tracks social understanding of MS, organisational sustainability, advocacy and quality-of-life outcomes.
aspiring entrepreneurs engaged
startup solutions developed
programme curriculum sessions
expert mentors
reported major positive shift in attitude toward entrepreneurship
reported significant increase in confidence applying entrepreneurial skills
These figures describe programme reach, outputs and participant-reported shifts. The monitoring framework is designed to go further over time by examining participation in entrepreneurial activity, knowledge, confidence, business-model development and progression into further study or entrepreneurship-related pathways.
households benefited from the Jaba’ water project
residents reached through improved water access
female participation reported by PACES
Community work also includes cultural and advocacy projects, emergency response and targeted community support. Because these interventions differ significantly in purpose and scale, sTF5 Care does not combine them into a single headline number. Each should be assessed against the result it was designed to achieve.
Outcome measurement
Building a clearer distinction between activities, outputs, outcomes and long-term ambition.
Theory of Change and logframes
Using shared frameworks to connect programme activity with measurable pathways of change.
Partner reporting
Improving consistency in technical, financial and outcome reporting without creating reporting for its own sake.
Institutional learning
Using programme data, field experience and partner insight to inform future selection, design and funding decisions.